Archive for June, 2009
Premiums on the Rise
After nearly two decades of falling prices, term life-insurance premiums are heading up. (Source: WSJ.com: Health)
Read the original:
Premiums on the Rise
Related Posts:
The assessment of free volitional competence in cases of suicide with life insurance. – Cording C, Saß H.
[ePub (volume, issue, and page range not yet available)]
The German insurance law stipulates that in cases of suicide, life insurance providers are not obligated to pay within a restriction period of 3 years, except if it can be proven that the sui… (Source: SafetyLit: All (Unduplicated))
Continued here:
The assessment of free volitional competence in cases of suicide with life insurance. – Cording C, Saß H.
Related Posts:
The assessment of free volitional competence in cases of suicide with life insurance. – Cording C, Saß H.
[ePub (volume, issue, and page range not yet available)]
The German insurance law stipulates that in cases of suicide, life insurance providers are not obligated to pay within a restriction period of 3 years, except if it can be proven that the sui… (Source: SafetyLit: All (Unduplicated))
See the rest here:
The assessment of free volitional competence in cases of suicide with life insurance. – Cording C, Saß H.
Related Posts:
The assessment of free volitional competence in cases of suicide with life insurance. – Cording C, Saß H.
[ePub (volume, issue, and page range not yet available)]
The German insurance law stipulates that in cases of suicide, life insurance providers are not obligated to pay within a restriction period of 3 years, except if it can be proven that the sui… (Source: SafetyLit: All (Unduplicated))
Excerpt from:
The assessment of free volitional competence in cases of suicide with life insurance. – Cording C, Saß H.
Related Posts:
Supreme Court Declines To Consider Remedy For ERISA Procedural Violation
WASHINGTON, D.C. – The U.S. Supreme Court on June 1 denied review of a Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals Nov. 18 ruling that a district court erred by granting a disability claimant long-term disability benefits for a violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act’s requirement that a claimant is entitled to notice of her right to an administrative appeal on an adverse benefits determination. The appeals panel held that the proper remedy for the procedural violation was to remand the matter to the plan administrator for a full and fair review (Joanne Gagliano v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company, No. 08-1068, U.S. Sup.; See December 2008, Page 15).
Full story on lexis.com (Source: LexisNexis
Related Posts:
Evidence Supports Benefit Denial, Oregon Federal Judge Finds
PORTLAND, Ore. – An insurer that relied on seven medical record reviews in its decision to deny benefits to a claimant with cancer acted reasonably, a federal judge in Oregon ruled June 3 (Fred A. Barnes v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America, No. 04-1203, D. Ore.; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47979).
Full story on lexis.com (Source: LexisNexis
Related Posts:
Federal Judge: Briefing In Violation Of Discovery Rulings Stricken
NEWARK, N.J. – A federal judge in New Jersey on June 2 ruled that a disability claimant’s summary judgment pleadings should be stricken because they violate the court’s previous discovery rulings. The judge, however, refused to impose sanctions and instead allowed the claimant to refile its briefings (Richard D. Weiss v. First Unum Life Insurance Co., et al., No. 02-4249, D. N.J.; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46116).
Full story on lexis.com (Source: LexisNexis
Related Posts:
Dismissal Sanction Was Not Abuse Of Discretion, 10th Circuit Holds
DENVER – The 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on June 10 upheld sanctions that dismissed a breach of contract action against a disability insurer that denied benefits to a claimant with post-traumatic stress syndrome and other ailments. The appeals court said the lower court did not abuse its discretion in issuing sanctions (Tina Garcia v. Berkshire Life Insurance Company of America, et al., No. 08-1022, 10th Cir.; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 12503).
Full story on lexis.com (Source: LexisNexis
Related Posts:
Dismissal Sanction Was Not Abuse Of Discretion, 10th Circuit Holds
DENVER – The 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on June 10 upheld sanctions that dismissed a breach of contract action against a disability insurer that denied benefits to a claimant with post-traumatic stress syndrome and other ailments. The appeals court said the lower court did not abuse its discretion in issuing sanctions (Tina Garcia v. Berkshire Life Insurance Company of America, et al., No. 08-1022, 10th Cir.; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 12503).
Full story on lexis.com (Source: LexisNexis
Related Posts:
Dismissal Sanction Was Not Abuse Of Discretion, 10th Circuit Holds
DENVER – The 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on June 10 upheld sanctions that dismissed a breach of contract action against a disability insurer that denied benefits to a claimant with post-traumatic stress syndrome and other ailments. The appeals court said the lower court did not abuse its discretion in issuing sanctions (Tina Garcia v. Berkshire Life Insurance Company of America, et al., No. 08-1022, 10th Cir.; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 12503).
Full story on lexis.com (Source: LexisNexis
